After the Peak: The End of Tight Money

The tightening cycle has ended in advanced economies. Central banks in Washington, Frankfurt, and London cut rates from multi-decade peaks. Inflation moderates. Policy loosens. Yet in emerging markets, the end of Northern tight money produces Southern constraint. Currencies depreciate despite domestic rate cuts. Capital flows reverse direction. Domestic monetary easing triggers market tightening through risk spreads.

The asymmetry is structural. When the Federal Reserve raises rates, emerging markets tighten to stem outflows. When the Fed lowers rates but slower than markets expected, emerging currencies still face pressure. Policy space narrows. The end of tight money in the North does not restore easy conditions in the South. It reveals how constrained Southern policymaking remains, even when Northern central banks ease.

---

The Currency Squeeze: Depreciation Without Relief

Emerging market currencies declined by approximately 4 percent against the US dollar in 2024 on a net basis, even after partially recovering in recent weeks, according to the International Monetary Fund. Latin American currencies dropped 5 percent, while Asian emerging market currencies fell 4 percent. Central and Eastern European and African currencies experienced milder depreciations, though pressure remained across regions.

The decline occurred despite improving fundamentals in many emerging economies. At the beginning of 2024, investors expected the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates significantly, which would have widened or at least maintained interest rate differentials favoring emerging markets. Instead, the US economy proved stronger than anticipated and inflation remained above the Fed's 2 percent target. Expectations for US rate cuts dissipated over the first half of 2024, narrowing the interest differential that supports emerging market currencies.

Countries with the most pronounced narrowing of interest rate differentials, notably several Latin American countries that reduced policy rates in response to slower inflation, experienced the largest exchange rate depreciations against the dollar, according to IMF analysis. The pattern demonstrates a fundamental constraint: currency depreciation can occur even when the economic outlook for a country is solid, because it is the relative level of interest rates that matters most in global capital markets.

The contrast with historical episodes is instructive. In 1982, after sizable Federal Reserve tightening, a basket of emerging market currencies depreciated 30 percent against the dollar, and the Mexican peso fell 80 percent, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Over the same period, the dollar gained 10 percent against a basket of advanced economy currencies. The pattern repeated during the Fed tightening cycle from 1994 to mid-1995, when the same basket of emerging currencies slumped 20 percent and the Mexican peso fell by half versus the dollar. Meanwhile, the basket of advanced economy currencies appreciated 13 percent against the dollar.

By comparison, from early 2022 to mid-2023, emerging market currencies depreciated only modestly based on a trade-weighted index of the dollar exchange rate of major US trading partners, and the Mexican peso appreciated 15 percent against the dollar. At the same time, advanced economy currencies depreciated more than emerging market currencies during this tightening cycle. The improvement reflects stronger policy frameworks, deeper local currency markets, and more adequate foreign exchange reserves. Yet 2024 demonstrates that pressure persists when the Fed delays expected easing.

---

The Policy Paradox: Easing Triggers Tightening

Research by IMF First Deputy Managing Director Gita Gopinath, along with Sebnem Kalemli-Özcan and Pierre De Leo, demonstrates a critical asymmetry. When emerging market central banks loosen policy, the transmission to short-term market rates depends critically on what happens to global financial conditions. If global financial conditions tighten enough, as often follows a surprise tightening in US monetary policy, then domestic market rates may even rise when the emerging market central bank lowers policy rates.

The implicit rise in the risk spread facing borrowers blunts the effectiveness of monetary policy and makes it harder for emerging markets to cushion the effects of shocks. This is particularly relevant in 2026, where trade shocks could play out as negative demand shocks in many emerging markets, calling for looser monetary policy. At the same time, they could play out as negative supply shocks in the United States and call for tighter US monetary policy. The divergence creates impossible trade-offs.

Several major emerging market central banks have discussed exchange rate volatility and global uncertainty as part of their decision making, according to IMF analysis. Some slowed or paused rate cutting cycles. Others conducted foreign exchange interventions to manage currency volatility. These adjustments demonstrate that most emerging market central banks remain committed to policy frameworks that target domestic inflation and economic conditions rather than exchange rates per se. Yet exchange rate volatility continues to constrain their choices.

---

Capital Flow Reversal: The Resilience Question

Historically, a higher US federal funds rate has been associated with international investors withdrawing capital from emerging markets, which can lead to lower economic activity and depreciating exchange rates, and in turn greater financial vulnerability, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. To reduce capital outflows, central banks in emerging markets can tighten their own monetary policy rates to increase yields on debt securities. But raising interest rates comes with trade-offs.

The mechanism operates through multiple channels. Higher US rates make assets offered in emerging market economies less attractive, leading to lower financial flows to these countries. This increases the cost of borrowing in emerging markets, depressing demand. The falloff in capital flows puts pressure on exchange rates to lose value against the dollar. This raises the cost of imports whose prices are denominated in dollars, including oil, foods, raw materials, and many manufactured goods, putting upward pressure on inflation.

To counter these effects, emerging market central banks may raise their own domestic policy interest rates to continue to attract foreign funding and counter inflation, which depresses domestic demand. Higher interest rates, along with depreciation against the dollar, make it more expensive to pay back borrowing denominated in dollars. For countries with high levels of dollar-denominated debt, the constraint becomes binding.

The situation has improved compared to historical episodes. Over the past two decades, the foreign currency share of emerging market external debt declined notably, from 100 percent twenty years ago to around 60 percent currently, according to Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas research. This transition to domestic currency debt is mostly a feature of foreign-held public debt. Many corporate issuers of foreign currency debt are exporting firms with significant foreign currency-denominated assets or revenue, providing natural hedges.

Denominating nearly all emerging market external debt in foreign currencies was dubbed the original sin in economics literature around the turn of the century. An abrupt local currency depreciation would raise the debt burden, taking more of the local currency to make dollar-denominated interest and principal payments. This raised the probability of default for sovereign or financial sector debt, potentially making a currency crisis self-fulfilling, as during Mexico's Tequila Crisis in 1994.

---

Policy Space Divergence: Domestic Inflation Versus External Constraint

The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City examined the three most recent US policy tightening cycles to analyze when and why central banks in emerging markets raised their own policy rates. They found that while emerging markets sometimes raised rates in response to capital outflows or currency depreciation resulting from US monetary policy, they more frequently raised rates in response to domestic inflationary pressures.

This finding provides evidence that emerging market central banks have gained greater policy autonomy compared to historical episodes. Stronger fiscal and monetary policy frameworks, more developed local currency debt markets, and adequate foreign exchange reserves have supported emerging market resilience, according to IMF research. Faithful adoption of inflation targeting may lessen the pass-through of currency depreciations to domestic conditions.

Yet constraints remain. Several emerging market central banks that initially cut rates in 2024 in response to moderating domestic inflation faced renewed pressure to reverse course or pause easing as global financial conditions evolved. The constraint is most binding for countries with weaker policy frameworks, higher debt levels, or greater external financing needs.

---

After the Peak: Asymmetric Recovery

The end of tight money in advanced economies does not produce symmetric easing globally. Central banks in Washington, Frankfurt, and London cut rates from multi-decade peaks toward neutral levels estimated at 2.5 to 3.5 percent, well above pre-pandemic near-zero rates. Markets price in gradual descent over 2025 and 2026.

For emerging markets, the descent is constrained. Domestic inflation may moderate, creating technical space to ease. Yet global financial conditions, determined primarily by Federal Reserve policy and risk sentiment in advanced economy markets, constrain what emerging market central banks can deliver. When the Fed cuts rates but slower than markets expected, interest differentials narrow. Capital flows weaken. Currencies depreciate. Domestic easing triggers market tightening through widening risk spreads.

The resilience improvements of the past two decades matter. Local currency debt markets, inflation targeting frameworks, and adequate reserves reduce vulnerability compared to the crises of the 1980s and 1990s. The Mexican peso did not collapse 80 percent as it did in 1982. Emerging market currencies as a basket depreciated modestly in the 2022 to 2023 cycle compared to 30 percent declines historically.

Yet modest is not absent. A 4 to 5 percent depreciation still raises import costs, constrains purchasing power, and forces central banks to maintain tighter policy than domestic conditions alone would warrant. The policy space for countercyclical easing remains narrow. After the peak in advanced economies, emerging markets face not relief but a different form of constraint: tighter financial conditions delivered through markets rather than policy rates.