Fault Lines of the Emerging World Order: Power, Conflict & Realignment Across the Global South

The Meridian · World Ahead 2026

Fault Lines of the Emerging World Order

Power, conflict and realignment across the Global South

By The Meridian Geopolitical Intelligence Unit December 2025
Global power realignment and emerging world order
The world is not defined by the decline of one superpower but by the simultaneous rise of several competing systems · Photograph: Unsplash

In November 2023, Houthi rebels fired missiles at commercial vessels transiting the Red Sea. Within weeks, shipping through the Suez Canal—a conduit for 12 percent of global trade—fell by half. Freight costs tripled. African food prices surged. What began as a regional conflict became a global inflation event transmitted through a single maritime chokepoint.

This is how power operates in 2026. Not through grand ideological contests, but through control of arteries: shipping lanes that move goods, mineral deposits that enable batteries, river basins that sustain agriculture, and payment rails that clear transactions. The International Monetary Fund calculates that emerging markets now generate 58 percent of global output at purchasing-power parity. The United Nations projects that by 2030, 85 percent of the world's youth will live outside the West. Yet this quantitative shift masks a deeper fracture.

The post-1945 order assumed a single system with universal rules. That assumption no longer holds. China builds industrial networks independent of Western finance. India leverages demographic scale to reshape global labour markets. The Gulf deploys sovereign capital to secure influence across three continents. Russia weaponises grain and energy. Turkey exports military hardware to over 30 nations. Nine African countries expelled Western forces and formed new security compacts in three years.

These are not anomalies. They are fault lines—structural fractures where competing systems collide, creating zones of permanent instability but also unexpected realignment. This analysis maps those fractures using verified institutional data, tracing how geography, resources, demographics, and climate interact to determine who holds leverage in the emerging order.

58%
Emerging markets' share of global GDP at purchasing-power parity in 2024—a complete reversal from 1990 when advanced economies held 67%

The New Geography of Power: Maritime Chokepoints Under Siege

According to Lloyd's List and UNCTAD, roughly 80 percent of global trade by volume travels by sea, with 40 percent passing through strategic chokepoints. Three matter most for Global South economies.

The Red Sea and Bab-el-Mandeb

Prior to the Houthi attacks starting late 2023, 12 percent of global trade passed through the Red Sea-Suez corridor. By early 2024, shipping through Suez fell 40 to 50 percent as vessels rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope. Freight costs on Asia-Europe routes rose by 200 to 300 percent according to the Drewry Index. This disproportionately affects Africa and South Asia, where import-dependency is high and freight inflation passes directly into consumer prices.

Strait of Hormuz

The IEA estimates 21 percent of global petroleum liquids moved through Hormuz in 2022-23. Any escalation between Iran, Gulf states, or the US immediately tightens energy markets for South Asia and East Africa, which buy Gulf fuel on 30 to 60 day cycles.

Strait of Malacca

More than 60,000 ships per year carry one quarter of global traded goods and one third of global LNG through the Strait of Malacca. India, China, Japan, and Indonesia depend on its stability. These routes are not abstractions—they are inflation's pipelines.

Chart 1: Strategic Maritime Chokepoints—The Arteries of Global Trade
Critical straits controlling Global South import flows and energy security
Chokepoint Global Trade Share Strategic Significance
Red Sea / Suez Canal 12% 40-50% shipping decline post-2023; freight costs up 200-300%
Strait of Hormuz 21% (oil) Controls Gulf petroleum flows to South Asia, East Africa
Strait of Malacca 25% 60,000 ships/year; 33% global LNG; Asia-Pacific lifeline
Source: UNCTAD, Lloyd's List, IEA, Malaysian Maritime Authority, Drewry Shipping Index 2023-2024
"Maritime chokepoints are not abstractions—they are inflation's pipelines, determining whether import-dependent economies face stability or crisis."

Resource Corridors: Where Power and Vulnerability Meet

Critical minerals: the new industrial map

Verified from the IEA's 2023 Critical Minerals Market Review: the Democratic Republic of Congo controls approximately 70 percent of global cobalt output. Indonesia produces over 50 percent of the world's nickel. Chile and Australia together provide 75 percent of lithium. China refines 65 to 90 percent of key minerals including cobalt, rare earths, and graphite. This asymmetry defines the energy transition.

Food corridors: grain diplomacy

FAO and USDA data confirm Russia became the world's largest wheat exporter, shipping 45 to 50 million tonnes yearly. Brazil has become the largest soybean exporter and a top maize supplier to Africa. Thirty-six African states rely on over 50 percent wheat imports from Russia or Ukraine pre-2022. Food is leverage. Russia's grain discounting to Africa post-2022, and India's export bans during El Niño, show how vulnerabilities turn geopolitical.

Chart 2: Critical Mineral Concentration—The Energy Transition's Geopolitical Core
Control of minerals essential for batteries, electric vehicles, and renewable energy
China (Rare Earths Refining)
90%
Chile + Australia (Lithium Production)
75%
Democratic Republic of Congo (Cobalt)
70%
China (Critical Minerals Refining Capacity)
65%
Indonesia (Nickel Production)
50%
The energy transition cannot proceed without materials controlled by a handful of nations—creating new dependencies that replace oil with minerals.
Source: IEA Critical Minerals Market Review 2023, USGS mineral commodity summaries
36 States
African countries relying on over 50% wheat imports from Russia or Ukraine pre-2022—grain diplomacy as geopolitical leverage

The Age of Fragmentation: Regions in Transition

The Sahel: collapse of Western influence

According to ACLED and UNHCR, Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso juntas expelled French forces between 2021 and 2023. Over 2.6 million people were displaced in the Sahel by 2024. Wagner and the rebranded Africa Corps influence security outcomes. A new bloc—the Alliance of Sahel States—signals long-term military autonomy from Western institutions.

Middle East: from oil states to power brokers

Gulf sovereign wealth funds including PIF, ADIA, QIA, and Mubadala together manage over 4.6 trillion dollars. They now invest in energy transition metals, African infrastructure, Asian manufacturing, and global sports and logistics. The Gulf has shifted from Western client to global investor-jurisdiction.

South Asia: the instability corridor

Pakistan faces IMF-estimated external financing needs of 123 billion dollars from 2023 to 2027. Bangladesh reserves fell from 48 billion in 2021 to approximately 20 billion in 2023. Sri Lanka defaulted in 2022 with restructuring continuing. This region's fragility is structural: fuel import bills, climate vulnerability, and political volatility create a permanent financing crisis.

Chart 3: The Sahel's Strategic Realignment—Military Autonomy and External Influence
Major shifts in security partnerships 2021-2024
Country French Forces Status New Security Partners Displacement
Mali Expelled 2022 Wagner/Africa Corps, Russia 400,000+
Burkina Faso Expelled 2023 Russia, Alliance of Sahel States 2 million+
Niger Expelled 2023 Russia, regional autonomy 200,000+
Source: ACLED conflict data, UNHCR displacement monitoring, French Ministry of Defence statements 2021-2024
"The Alliance of Sahel States signals long-term military autonomy from Western institutions—a fundamental realignment of African security architecture."

Military Power Is Being Rebalanced

SIPRI data shows China's military spending reached 296 billion dollars in 2023, second globally. It launches more naval vessels annually than any other navy, with bases in Djibouti, Cambodia at Ream, and deep port access in Pakistan at Gwadar. India became the world's third-largest military spender at 83 billion dollars. Its navy is central to Indo-Pacific strategy through aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines, and port diplomacy in Mauritius and Seychelles.

Turkey exports TB2 drones to over 30 countries, with defence exports reaching 5.5 billion dollars in 2023. Saudi Arabia spent 75 billion while the UAE's exact figure is opaque but estimated at 25 to 30 billion. Since 2020, nine coups occurred in West and Central Africa. Military governments now form anti-Western, pro-security compacts backed by Russian training and Gulf financing.

Chart 4: Rising Military Powers—Defense Spending Reshapes Regional Balance
Annual military expenditure 2023 (USD billions), showing Global South capacity expansion
China
$296B
India
$83B
Saudi Arabia
$75B
United Arab Emirates (estimated)
$30B
Turkey
$25B
Strategic shift: China launches more naval vessels annually than any navy globally. India operates aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines. Turkey's drone exports reach 30+ countries. Gulf states build expeditionary capacity.
Source: SIPRI Military Expenditure Database 2023, national defense ministry disclosures
9 Coups
Military takeovers in West and Central Africa since 2020, forming anti-Western security compacts backed by Russian training and Gulf financing

Currencies, Payment Systems and the New Financial Geopolitics

Dollar dominance—still unmatched, but not uncontested

BIS confirms 88 percent of global foreign exchange transactions involve USD, while 58 percent of global reserves are in dollars. But diversification grows. China's yuan accounts for 2.3 percent of global reserves and 4.6 percent of SWIFT payments—small, but rising.

BRICS Pay and non-dollar settlements

Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and new entrants including Egypt, UAE, Ethiopia, and Iran expand local-currency oil settlements such as Russia-India trade, yuan-based LNG contracts between China and UAE, and India's rupee settlement for Mauritius, Sri Lanka, and Nepal. These are not a threat to the dollar—they are hedges.

Gulf petro-yuan experiments

Saudi Aramco sold test cargoes to China in yuan. UAE-China LNG cargoes settled in RMB. These are small-scale but symbolic, signaling the Gulf's willingness to diversify currency exposure beyond the dollar peg.

Chart 5: The Slow Erosion of Dollar Exclusivity
Currency shares in global reserves and payments—dollar dominance persists but alternatives emerge
Currency Global Reserves Share SWIFT Payments Share Trend
US Dollar (USD) 58% 88% (FX) Stable dominance, slow decline
Euro (EUR) 20% 31% Stable secondary reserve
Chinese Yuan (CNY) 2.3% 4.6% Rising, bilateral settlements
BRICS Alternatives ~3% Growing Local currency, oil/LNG trades
Source: BIS Triennial Survey, IMF COFER data, SWIFT messaging statistics 2023-2024
"Alternative currencies are not replacing the dollar—they are hedges against dollar monopoly, creating plural payment systems that reduce Western financial leverage."

Youth, Urbanisation and Unrest: Demography as Destiny

UN DESA confirms Africa's population will double to 2.5 billion by 2050. Median age stands at 18.8 years in Africa versus 42.7 in Europe. There are 240 million Africans aged 15 to 24 in 2025—the largest youth cohort ever. Youth meets job scarcity, urban pressure, weak public finances, and high food inflation.

This drives protest cycles: Sri Lanka 2022, Kenya 2023-24 Finance Bill protests with over 20 killed per KNHR, India's farm protests, and Nigeria's EndSARS movement. Demography does not guarantee instability, but amplifies it when institutions lag behind population growth and youth expectations.

Chart 6: The Great Demographic Divergence—Youth Bulge vs Aging Societies
Median age and youth population concentration reshaping global power dynamics
Region Median Age Youth (15-24) Population Geopolitical Implication
Africa 18.8 years 240 million Largest youth cohort ever; demographic dividend or crisis
South Asia 28.2 years 370 million Labour surplus; migration pressure; political volatility
Europe 42.7 years 60 million Aging workforce; immigration needs; fiscal strain
East Asia 39.5 years 180 million China's aging crisis; automation imperative
Source: UN DESA World Population Prospects 2024, population pyramid data

Climate as Geopolitical Force

Water wars

UN and satellite data confirm declines in Nile downstream flow as Ethiopia's GERD fills, Indus glacier melt feeding Pakistan's rivers, and Euphrates-Tigris water flow due to upstream dams. These shape national security doctrines.

Climate migration

IOM and UNHCR report over 32 million new displacements in 2022 due to disasters. Most occur in South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa. Climate displacement now exceeds conflict displacement in absolute numbers.

Adaptation financing gap

UNEP estimates developing nations require 215 to 387 billion dollars per year by 2030 for climate adaptation. Current adaptation finance stands at 21 billion—a tenfold gap that transforms climate vulnerability into sovereign debt crises.

Chart 7: The Climate Adaptation Financing Gap—A 10x Deficit
Annual adaptation finance needed vs actual flows (USD billions)
Current Annual Finance
$21B
Annual Need by 2030
$215-387B
Upper Estimate (Annual Need by 2030)
$387B
Lower Estimate (Annual Need by 2030)
$215B
Current Adaptation Finance
$21B
The 10x financing gap transforms climate vulnerability into sovereign debt crises as countries borrow externally to rebuild after disasters.
Source: UNEP Adaptation Gap Report 2024, OECD climate finance tracking
32 Million
New climate-driven displacements in 2022 alone—exceeding conflict displacement and reshaping migration corridors across South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa
Regional Power Snapshot: Trajectories Diverge Across the Global South
Comparative assessment of structural position and direction 2026
EAST ASIA
China: Industrial power, aging crisis
India: Demographic dividend, infrastructure gaps
Indonesia: Nickel leverage, political stability
Vietnam: Manufacturing magnet, climate exposure
MIDDLE EAST & GULF
Gulf States: Capital power, diversification progress
Turkey: Regional military actor, inflation stress
Egypt: Import dependency, fiscal fragility
Iran: Sanctions isolation, regional influence
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
Nigeria: Youth bulge, energy paradox
Kenya: Tech hub, debt burden
Ethiopia: Post-conflict, GERD leverage
Sahel: Security autonomy, fragmentation
SOUTH ASIA
Pakistan: Permanent refinancing, political crisis
Bangladesh: Manufacturing growth, reserves decline
Sri Lanka: Post-default restructuring
Nepal: Remittance economy, climate vulnerability
Source: Meridian regional assessment framework December 2025

Winners and Losers of the Emerging Order

Structural advantages cluster around demographic energy, resource endowments, manufacturing absorption capacity, and political stability. India combines demographics with manufacturing and technology. Indonesia leverages nickel dominance for industrialisation. Vietnam attracts supply-chain diversification. Morocco builds automotive and renewables capacity. Gulf states deploy capital globally while maintaining energy relevance. Fragile states face compounding vulnerabilities: Pakistan's fiscal crisis, Egypt's import dependency, Tunisia's political paralysis, Ethiopia's post-conflict reconstruction, and South Africa's energy collapse and unemployment crisis create permanent refinancing needs.

Chart 8: The Emerging Order's Structural Winners and Losers
Classification by demographic energy, resource control, and institutional resilience
Category Countries/Regions Structural Advantages / Vulnerabilities
Probable Winners India, Indonesia, Vietnam, Morocco, Gulf States Demographics + manufacturing + resources + capital + stability
Fragile States Pakistan, Egypt, Tunisia, Ethiopia, South Africa Fiscal crisis + import dependency + energy collapse + unemployment
Losing Strategic Weight Europe, Sahel (fragmented), Parts of Latin America Aging + slow growth + political volatility + security deterioration
Source: Meridian Geopolitical Intelligence Unit structural assessment 2026

The Meridian Forecast: Early Warning Indicators

These are not predictions, but risk trajectories grounded in empirical data. Five global triggers matter most: Red Sea escalation persistence beyond 12 to 18 months returns global inflation; China's property resolution path determines commodity demand and BRICS investment strength; US election outcomes determine tariffs, dollar strength, and energy markets; Gulf realignment as capital flows shift if Saudi-US or Saudi-China ties deepen; and South Asian default contagion as Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Nepal remain exposed to external shocks.

Early Warning Framework: Three Regions at Acute Risk
Compounding vulnerabilities requiring close monitoring through 2026
1 Horn of Africa — Climate stress + food insecurity + armed conflict (Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan) creating displacement and state fragility
2 Pakistan Corridor — IMF dependence + political volatility + climate disasters + energy crisis = permanent refinancing needs
3 North Africa — Food import dependency + energy bills + debt burden + youth unemployment fueling protest cycles
Source: Meridian risk assessment framework integrating fiscal, climate, and political indicators
⚡ The Meridian 2026 Geopolitical Risk Forecast
Maritime Chokepoints: Red Sea disruption persists into 2026, sustaining elevated freight costs and selective inflation in import-dependent economies. Hormuz tensions rise if Iran-Israel-US escalation intensifies. Mineral Competition: China consolidates refining dominance 70-85% across critical minerals; US-EU scramble for alternative supply chains drives Africa infrastructure bidding wars. Gulf Realignment: Saudi Arabia-China energy settlements expand; UAE becomes leading Asia-Africa capital bridge; Western influence in Gulf continues structural decline. South Asia Fragility: Pakistan requires 4th consecutive IMF programme; Bangladesh faces political transition risks; Sri Lanka restructuring stalls. Military Buildups: China launches 2-3 major naval vessels monthly; India accelerates carrier and submarine programmes; Turkey expands drone sales to 40+ countries.

Structural Bright Spots in the Emerging Order

Amid fragmentation, several trajectories offer structural resilience. India's supply-chain absorption accelerates as manufacturing diversifies from China. Indonesia's nickel-powered industrialisation positions it as the energy transition's critical node. The Gulf's financial rise transforms petrostates into sovereign investment powers deploying capital across continents. East Africa's digital economy, led by Kenya's mobile money innovation and Ethiopia's tech sector growth, demonstrates leapfrog development potential.

The emerging world order is not a simple power transition from West to East. It is a fracturing into plural systems—each with its own currency experiments, security compacts, resource corridors, and demographic pressures. The question for 2026 is not which system will dominate, but how these competing architectures will coexist, collide, or converge along the fault lines mapped in this analysis.

Methodology & Data Standards

This analysis synthesizes verified data from SIPRI military expenditure database, UNCTAD maritime trade statistics, IEA Critical Minerals Market Review, Lloyd's List shipping intelligence, BIS foreign exchange statistics, IMF GDP purchasing-power parity calculations, UN DESA population projections, ACLED conflict data, UNHCR displacement monitoring, FAO food trade data, USDA agricultural statistics, UNEP adaptation gap reports, and sovereign wealth fund disclosures (SWFI). All figures cited represent official institutional data or peer-reviewed estimates.

Maritime chokepoint statistics verified against Malaysian Maritime Authority vessel counts, Drewry Shipping Consultants freight indices, and Suez Canal Authority traffic reports. Military spending figures from national defense ministry disclosures cross-referenced with SIPRI standardized calculations. Currency data from IMF COFER reserves database and SWIFT messaging statistics. Climate displacement from IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix and IDMC Global Report. All regional classifications based on multi-indicator structural assessments. Data compiled December 2025.

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.